Cases 1 - 10 of 100
John Burnley v. Alexandra Valentin
as 26-1978
Plaintiff:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA M. VALENTIN, JEFFREY W. WALBURN, ROBERT BONO and others
Scott v. Christy et al
as 1:2026cv00156
Plaintiff:
Franklin T. Scott
Defendant:
Jean M. Christy, Brenda Davis, Kristy Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Christy et al
as 1:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
Franklin T. Scott
Defendant:
Quentin Miller, Derek Reed, Shannon Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Burnley v. Jeffrey Walburn
as 26-1158
Plaintiff:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY W. WALBURN, ALEXANDRA M. VALENTIN, MARGARET CUNNINGHAM, Detective, City of Richmond Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Burnley v. Jeffrey Walburn
as 25-1634
Plaintiff:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY W. WALBURN, ALEXANDRA M. VALENTIN, MARGARET CUNNINGHAM, Detective, City of Richmond Police Department and others
John Burnley v. Alexandra Valentin
as 25-1622
Plaintiff:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant:
ALEXANDRA M. VALENTIN, JEFFREY W. WALBURN, ROBERT BONO and others
Burnley v. Walburn et al
as 3:2025cv00210
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Walburn, Alexandra M. Valentin, Margaret Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hanowski v. Kothandaraman et al
as 4:2025cv00652
Plaintiff:
Greg Hanowski
Defendant:
Raghuveer Belur, Steven J. Gomo, Jamie Haenggi and others
Petitioner:
Abdul Hirani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hirani v. Kothandaraman et al
as 4:2024cv09532
Defendant:
Thurman John Rodgers, Jamie Haenggi, Richard Mora and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hirani
Interested Party:
Greg Hanowski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.