Cases 11 - 20 of 61
El v. City of Myrtle Beach et al
as 4:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
City of Myrtle Beach, City of Myrtle Beach Police Department, David Giosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01994
Plaintiff:
Tarahjay M Ross
Defendant:
Captain Steve Smith, Lt. Greg Mendenhall, Lt. Richard Armermann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Saine et al
as 5:2019ct03380
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Revenue and N. Saine
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Paisley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Terry Boyd, Lewis Matthews and Kalah Paisley
Plaintiff:
Luke John Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Agostino v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00337
Defendant:
Brian Sandoval, Dr. Marks, Melissa Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank S. D'Agostino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv01828
Plaintiff:
John Scott
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical LLC , Neil Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urlacher v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05912
Plaintiff:
Charles RP Urlacher
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, Patrisha Lashway, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Mullins v. Richard Lisenbe, et al
as 16-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Mullins
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Lisenbe, Sheriff, John Scott, Corporal, Deon Kelly, Nurse and others
Mullins v. Lisenbee et al
as 4:2016cv01484
Plaintiff:
Steven Mullins
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbe, John Scott, Deon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Phelps County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv01188
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Mullins
Defendant:
Phelps County Sheriff's Department, Phelps County Jail, John Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
