Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Johnson v. Andrew Cuomo
as 22-1156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. CUOMO, JOHNATHAN JAMES SMITH, WILLIAM LAMOT and others
Burnett et al v. Invitation Home et al
as 6:2020cv01679
Plaintiff:
Taneah Burnett and Karima Johnson
Defendant:
Invitation Home, Johnathan James, Denisse Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnett et al v. Invitation Home et al
as 6:2020cv01681
Plaintiff:
Taneah Burnett and Karima Johnson
Defendant:
Invitation Home, Johnathan James, Denisse Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnathan Pinney v. Johnathan James, et al
as 20-2738
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Illinois, Schamoon, Deputy Warden, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
WEAVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34856
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN JAMES WEAVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnathan Pinney v. Johnathan James, et al
as 19-3641
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Brown, State Attorney, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County, Foster, Judge, Van Buren and Faulkner County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Pinney v. James et al
as 4:2019cv00509
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Pinney
Defendant:
Lucas Emberton, Schamoon, Johnathan James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01554
Petitioner:
JOHNATHAN JAMES PEREZ
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MONAGHAN et al v. PONTE
as 1:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MONAGHAN and JOHNATHAN JAMES MONAGHAN
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2009cv04945
Plaintiff:
WADE D. LEE and TANEIDA P. LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
