Cases 71 - 80 of 7,618
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
State of West Virginia v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Emmanuel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones et al v. Baltimore Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Carlene Jones, Talease Gaither and Sharonda Finch
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Department, Clayton Leak, Matthew Tobjy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv01066
Petitioner:
Shareca Latoya Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Alan Delbert Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
