Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PEDRAZA PULIDO et al v. REYNOSO et al
as 1:2023cv01296
Plaintiff: JOSE JESUS PEDRAZA PULIDO, ARACELI CORTEZ, N. C. and others
Defendant: RENE REYNOSO, JR., INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grande Produce, Ltd. Co. v. Produce & More Enterprise LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00313
Plaintiff: Grande Produce, Ltd. Co. and B and M Avocados LLC
Defendant: Produce & More Enterprise LLC, Gerardo Guillen, Miguel Pedraza Villareal and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
PEDRAZA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12836
Plaintiff: JOSE GUELLERMO PEDRAZA
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pedraza et al v. Hamilton Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 7:2017cv00365
Plaintiff: Jose R Pedraza
Defendant: Hamilton Specialty Insurance Company , Engle Martin & Associates, Inc., Jill Ashworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
US v. Carrasquillo-Pedraza
as 15-2077
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE CARRASQUILLO-PEDRAZA, a/k/a Bibi Truco
US v. Carrasquillo-Pedraza
as 15-2037
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE CARRASQUILLO-PEDRAZA, a/k/a Bibi Truco
Pedraza v. Matlock & Sons, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv00147
Defendant: Matlock & Sons, Inc., , Daniel Estep and John Doe
Plaintiff: Jose A Pedraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jose Flores-Pedraza We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-40582
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE FLORES-PEDRAZA
Lauer et al v. Sharp Interiors Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00111
Plaintiff: Michael Lauer , William Nix , David Tharp and others
Defendant: Sharp Interiors Inc and Jose A Pedraza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jose Arcila-Pedraza
as 11-123
Movant: In re: JOSE ARCILA-PEDRAZA
:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?