Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman v. Goodman et al
as 2:2024cv01037
Defendant:
Shelli Hayes, Sheriff of Dubuque County, Robert Richter and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Andrew Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01038
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 All Writs Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49237
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH GOODMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
Nolan Harvey , Scott Adams , Cecil Adkins and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Kenny v. Michael Bartman, Jr., et al
as 16-2152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL KENNY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHN BARTMAN, JR., ANTHONY MICHAEL AMECHE, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, DAN SKORICH, Magistrate and others
Kenny v. Bartman et al
as 1:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Michael Kenny
Defendant:
Michael John Bartman, Jr., Anthony Michael Ameche, Dan Skorich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bale v. Wonders et al
as 4:2015cv05061
Plaintiff:
John M Bale
Defendant:
Lori Wonders , Jackie Fluaitt , Joseph Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
