Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Joseph H. v. J.M. Smucker Company
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hollis and Joseph H.
Defendant:
The J.M. Smucker Company and J.M. Smucker Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hollis v. The J.M. Smucker Company
as 1:2023cv05239
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hollis
Defendant:
The J.M. Smucker Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McFarlane v. Joseph Holly et al
as 3:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Robert Mcfarlane
Defendant:
Joseph Holly, MR. M. Dunkle, MR. P. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFARLANE v. JOSEPH HOLLY et al
as 2:2023cv02676
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCFARLANE
Defendant:
JOSEPH HOLLY, MR. M. DUNKLE, MR. P. WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71488
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollis et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04455
Plaintiff:
Emily Hollis and Joseph Hollis, Sr.
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Hollis v. B M Cash et al
as 2:2010cv07190
Defendant:
Lt C Campbell and B M Cash
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hollis
William Holly v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 10-60374
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HOLLY
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and JAMES V ANDERSON, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
William Holly v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 10-70013
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOSEPH HOLLY
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
