Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Jason Poindexter v. Jeff Sandy
as 21-6638
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF SANDY, personally and in his official capacity as the Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety, SERGEANT PAUL DIAMOND, personally and in his official capacity as a correctional officer with the West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOSEPH WOOD, personally and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Western Regional Jail and others
Defendant:
WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON POINDEXTER
Gilmore v. Wood et al
as 3:2021cv00010
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Joseph Wood
Plaintiff:
LaQuinn Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv52222
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39865
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JOSEPH WOOD JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38801
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25424
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMMY JOSEPH WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Tynon
as 9:2020cv00009
Petitioner:
Joseph Woods
Respondent:
Teresa Tynon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
