Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Khurana v. City of Newport and its Servants Lessors, Tenants Successors and Assigns et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Praveen Khurana
Defendant:
City of Newport and its Servants Lessors, Tenants Successors and Assigns, Newport Festival Association, Lavender Festival Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Piccone v. Dickenson et al
as 3:2012cv30127
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Piccone
Defendant:
Dickenson, Hein, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherryhill Management, Inc. et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Cherryhill Management, Inc. and Michael Walsh
Defendant:
John Doe, Josh Doe and Jason Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry McCrary v. A.W. Stange, et al
as 11-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerry McCrary
Defendant - Appellee:
A.W. Stange, Assistant Warden, Brannon Gibson, Criminal Investigator's Unit Investigator, Josh Doe, Investigator, Criminal Investigator Unit and others
McCrary v. Stange et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jerry McCrary
Defendant:
A. W. Stange, Brannon Gibson, Josh Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
287 Franklin Avenue Residents' Association et al v. Meisels et al
as 1:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
287 Franklin Avenue Residents' Association, Kurt Fletcher, Lisa Lin and others
Defendant:
Joe Doe, Josh Doe, Nathan Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McCrary v. Doe et al
as 1:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jerry McCrary
Defendant:
Josh Doe, Steve Julian, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
