Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Israel Schvimmer v. Roderick Randall
as 22-2851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Israel Schvimmer and Miriam Schvimmer
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Detective Buckner, of the 79th Precinct, David A. Hansell, (Reg. #1950179) individually and as NYC Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services, Rebecca Elizabeth Szewczuk, (Reg. #4686903) individually and as Attorney for NYC ACS-Kings County (Family Court) and Attorney for Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
The Office of Court Administration, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and others
Hopkins et al v. Vivint Solar Developer, LLC
as 1:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
William Hopkins, Joyce Hopkins and Evetta Hopkins
Defendant:
Vivint Solar Developer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1667
HOPKINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01221
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOYCE HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. Pitchal et al
as 1:2018cv06624
Defendant:
Ethan Wolf, Avinash Maharaji, Lauren Michelle Wolfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Cacidas Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PRICE et al v. EASTON COACH COMPANY, et al
as 3:2010cv01395
Plaintiff:
KYLE PRICE , CHRISTINA PALACIOS , IRENE JAQUISH and others
Objector:
arbtre
Defendant:
EASTON COACH COMPANY, DAVID BOUCHER, JOE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hopkins et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02407
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hopkins and William Hopkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hopkins et al v. Davol, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hopkins, Joyce Hopkins, Joyce Hopkins and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
