Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Figueroa
as 23-6159
Defendant / Appellant: JULIO FIGUEROA and Sealed Defendant 1
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: Da Graca, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Figueroa v. Finley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00210
Respondent: Scott Finley
Petitioner: Julio Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIGUEROA et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv01629
Plaintiff: MARY FIGUEROA and JULIO FIGUEROA
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Figueroa-Garcia et al
as 3:2017cv01721
Plaintiff: Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Julio Figueroa-Garcia and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Figueroa v. Tripp et al
as 5:2014hc02082
Petitioner: Julio Figueroa
Respondent: Brick Tripp and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. $209,815 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00780
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $209,815 in United States Currency
Claimant: Julio Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?