Cases 1 - 10 of 3,524
Wilder v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv03247
Plaintiff:
Julius Wilder
Defendant:
Naquan Owens, Penske Truck Leasing and Dalion Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Julius Wright
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stewart v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Julius Stewart
Defendant:
SA Johnson and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In The Struggle Productions LLC v. Herrara et al
as 1:2024cv02782
Defendant:
Julius Ceazar Herrara, DEVILGEAR Records LLC and Empire Distribution, Inc.
Other:
In The Struggle Productions LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Julius Larry, IV v. Noah Abrams, et al
as 24-11169
Plaintiff:
JULIUS JAMES LARRY, IV
Defendant:
NOAH ABRAMS, HERBERT HARLEY, JONATHAN COUR and others
Larry v. Mims
as 4:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Julius James Larry, IV
Respondent:
Charles M Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE BAKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
