Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Parkins v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, K Lay, Dexter Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael/ Achilles Gentry v. Roosevelt Barden, et al
as 22-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael/ Achilles Romulus Gentry
Defendant / Appellee:
Roosevelt Barden, Captain, E.A.R.U., Jeremy J. Sykes, Sergeant, E.A.R.U., Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden, E.A.R.U. (Originally named A Jackson) and others
Stephen Puleo et al v. Patrick Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv06443
Plaintiff:
Stephen Puleo, Michelle Puleo, Lee E. Hughes and others
Defendant:
Patrick Nelson, Nelson Partners, LLC, AXONIC CAPITAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Melendez v. City of Mountain View et al
as 5:2021mc80081
Plaintiff:
Mario Edgardo Melendez
Defendant:
Anthony R Reinosa, Joshua K Lai, Benjamin F Kroutil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. City of Mountain View et al
as 5:2021cv02651
Plaintiff:
Mario Edgardo Melendez
Defendant:
Anthony R Reinosa, Joshua K Lai, Benjamin F Kroutil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Barden et al
as 2:2021cv00012
Defendant:
K Lay, Jeremy J Sykes, Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael/Achilles Romulus Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfield Solutions, LLC v. Lay Seed Farms, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Winfield Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Lay Seed Farms, LLC , Robert A. Lay and Darla K Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lai v. Covisint Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv12183
Defendant:
Andreas Mai, Lawrence David Hansen, Jonathan Yaron and others
Plaintiff:
Valiant K Lai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Keuning v. Covisint Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv11958
Plaintiff:
Dirk Keuning , Robert Berg and Valiant K Lai
Defendant:
Covisint Corp., Bernard M. Goldsmith, William O. Grabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
