Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Roy v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
Kamal Karna K Roy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kamal Roy v. Unknown Defendant
as 11-10370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K ROY, also known as Joseph Geronimo, Jr., also known as Jungle Democracy, also known as Reforms International, also known as Kamal K. K. Roy, also known as Karnal Karna Roy, also known as K. K.K. Roy
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Kamal Roy v. Unnamed Defendant
as 11-11632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K ROY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT
B.A.R.-M.M.P., Inc. v. Regional Loan Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00753
Plaintiff:
B.A.R.-M.M.P., Inc.
Defendant:
Regional Loan Corporation, New Orleans Regional Business Development Corporation, Bill Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. Association & Conglomerate
as 11-1255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL K. ROY, Rev. Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSOCIATION & CONGLOMERATE, WE THE PEOPLE OF USA, USA GOVT and others
Roy v. Hartford Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
Debra K. Roy
Defendant:
Hartford Life Insurance Company , Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roy et al v. We the People of USA et al
as 1:2011mc00003
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Roy and Association & Conglomerate
Defendant:
We the People of USA, USA Govt and NYS Govt
Roy v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2010cv02550
Plaintiff:
Kamal K Roy
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROY v. THE CONGLOMERATE OF 7.2 MILLION UNINCORP.
as 1:2010cv01547
Plaintiff:
DR KAMEL K. ROY
Defendant:
THE CONGLOMERATE OF 7.2 MILLION UNINCORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roy v. USA Gov't Wahington D.C., et al.
as 1:2010mc00057
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Roy
Defendant:
USA Gov't Wahington D.C., et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
