Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Graves v. Stephens et al
as 3:2020cv00727
Defendant:
K. Stephens, Warden Unknown Nash, S. Baymon-Allen and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes et al v. Berry et al
as 3:2020cv03039
Defendant:
William H. Edwards, Albert J. Dooley, Jr., Mary M. Caskey and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Marshall and Demetric Hayes
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
William Bell v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 20-16600
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF ARIZONA, WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, County Attorney, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE BELL
Carrerou v. Houston et al
as 8:2019cv02233
Defendant:
Donald K. Stephens and David J. Houston
Plaintiff:
Oswald P. Carrerou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephens v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00249
Petitioner:
Mr. John K Stephens and John K. Stephens
Respondent:
Mr. Tim Shoop and Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2019cv04809
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Richard L Nothwehr, Dewain D Fox and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Marc Stephens, et al
as 19-1447
Undetermined:
DET. SANTIAGO INCLE, JR., NINA C. REMSON, Attorney at Law, LLC, WILLIAM J. MARTINI and others
STEPHENS v. WARDEN
as 1:2019cv00084
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
LONNIE K. STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01685
Defendant:
Mr. Kotey, D. Rains, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingersoll v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01321
Defendant:
. Kotey, . Ritz, D. Rains and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Ingersoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
