Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wiggins v. 360 Management et al
as 3:2026cv01179
Plaintiff:
Vicky Diane Wiggins
Defendant:
360 Management and Glendower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Garuer, et al
as 26-1842
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
RANDALL E. GARUER, PAUL E. BONANNO, LAWRENCE JOSEPH VILARDO and others
Thomas v. City of Riverdale et al
as 1:2026cv04102
Defendant:
Government Tax Solutions, City of Riverdale, Evelyn Wynn Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiggins v. Bisignano
as 3:2026cv01136
Plaintiff:
Danny Wiggins
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Public Health and Welfare HHS
Lettieri v. Uneiveler et al
as 1:2026cv13220
Plaintiff:
David C Lettieri
Defendant:
Uneiveler, Doe, Patrantic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beasley v. Birdsong et al
as 3:2026cv00965
Plaintiff:
Bari Beasley
Defendant:
Shelly Birdsong, Pamela Chandler, Mary Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wiggins v. Tafoya Lucero et al
as 2:2026cv02252
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya Lucero, Gary Maciel, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Marcourt Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13176
Plaintiff:
David C Lettieri
Defendant:
Marcourt Inc., D Wiggins, S. Marshal Gondalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 5:2026cv04814
Plaintiff:
HENRIETTA C. WIGGINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WIGGINS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2026cv04814
Plaintiff:
HENRIETTA C. WIGGINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
