Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. JUSTIA INCORPORATED
as 3:2019cv20135
Defendant:
JUSTIA INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. HUBER et al
as 3:2018cv09187
Defendant:
MARISSA M. HUBER, JUSTIA.COM, NJ COURT OF APPEALS CLERKS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Intervenor:
EUGENE VOLOKH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bonner v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2017cv11379
Plaintiff:
Corey K Bonner
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Andrew Bonner, Jr. v. Walt Disney Co, et al
as 17-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WALT DISNEY CO and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Andrew Bonner, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BONNER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01379
Defendant:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPLE INCORPORATED and UBISOFT
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BONNER v. WALT DISNEY COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
WALT DISNEY COMPANY and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BONNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PATENT COMMISSION and U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
