Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PC) Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Defendant:
R. Ndoh, P. Vera, K. Donaldson and others
Plaintiff:
Alim S. Urmancheev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Kamen et al
as 2:2017cv01679
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Vazquez
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kamen, E. Conannan, Nancy Siegrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Kamen et al
as 1:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Vazquez
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kamen, E. Conannan, Nancy Siegrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donaldson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23140
Plaintiff:
Penny K. Donaldson and Gary Donaldson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Donaldson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv29921
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Donaldson and Thomas Donaldson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timms v. Taylor et al
as 5:2013ct03260
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Timms
Defendant:
Andre Taylor, Andres E. Hernandez, M. Malterer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RESNICOFF v. DONALDSON et al
as 3:2011cv06473
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY RESNICOFF
Defendant:
CONWAY K. DONALDSON, HARRY JOSEPH MCCOLLOUGH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Boyd v. State of AZ, et al
as 10-4536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD E. BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF AZ, MARICOPA CTY AZ, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARICOPA CTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
