Cases 1 - 10 of 16
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
JERAMIE K. YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAREY et al v. BOARDWALK REGENCY, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv13700
Plaintiff:
VANDA E. CAREY and THOMAS P. CAREY
Defendant:
BOARDWALK REGENCY, LLC and CHANG K. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Oduardo et al
as 1:2020cv03031
Defendant:
Oduardo Transport Corp., Costi, LLC, National Indemnity Company of the South and others
Plaintiff:
Kaye K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11660
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janice K Young and Janice Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02271
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Young
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. Carpenter
as 1:2015cv01303
Plaintiff:
Neil J. Young and Kristyn K. Young
Defendant:
Debra K. Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Young v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01900
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Young
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv05123
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Young
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Arizona Western College District et al
as 2:2014cv01234
Defendant:
Arizona Western College District, Glenn E Mayle and L Ruth Whisler
Plaintiff:
Llewellyn K Young, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv16943
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Young and Ernest K. Young
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
