Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02313
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
In re: Combs
as 26-3106
Petitioner: BOVI LAMONTE COMBS
Respondent: A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Tennessee Board of Pharmacy et al
as 3:2026cv00685
Plaintiff: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark Rx, L.L.C., Advanced Care Scripts, Inc. and others
Defendant: Tennessee Board of Pharmacy, Shanea McKinney, Marlin Blane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Bolton, et al
as 26-3103
Plaintiff: ANGELIINA LYNN LAWSON
Defendant: ANDREW BOLTON, THE BOLTON LAW FIRM, LLC, DARRELL ROBINSON and others
Victoria Holloman v. Emanuel Cleaver, II, et al
as 26-1979
Plaintiff: Victoria C. Holloman, A.M.K.K., a minor child, by and through next friend Victoria C. Holloman and A.G.H
Defendant: Emanuel Cleaver, II, individual and official capacity, Quinton Lucas, individual and official capacity, Kansas City Police Department, official capacity and others
In re: Martin
as 26-3099
Petitioner: FREDERICK MARTIN
Respondent: KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Priess-Sievers v. Colorado, State of et al
as 4:2026cv00502
Plaintiff: Benjamin Priess-Sievers
Defendant: Colorado, State of, Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McGee (ID 2000082110) v. Kansas Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2026cv03129
Plaintiff: Antonio A. McGee
Defendant: Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02283
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?