Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hawkins v. Synhrony Bank et al
as 1:2023cv06583
Plaintiff:
Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Synhrony Bank and National Floors Direct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63891
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24722
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH HAWKINS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Joey Hawkins
as 19-40608
Defendant / Appellant:
JOEY KEITH HAWKINS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alvin Todd, et al v. Tempur-Sealy International, In, et al
as 16-80155
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ALVIN TODD, BRIAN STONE, ROBBIE SIMMONS and others
Defendant - Respondent:
TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC., FDBA Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. and TEMPUR-PEDIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Lewis v. Hawkins et al (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Paul William Lewis
Defendant:
Keith Hawkins and Scott County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 6:2015cv00950
Petitioner:
Joey Keith Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Josephs v. Offutt, et al
as 15-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOPHIA JOSEPHS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OFFUTT, CLAUDE JOSEPH, KEITH HAWKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
