Cases 1 - 10 of 8,271
THE MASYC GROUP, INC. v. Lam et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Plaintiff:
THE MASYC GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
Jonathan Lam, Kelley Keyes, Greg Demmelmaier and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Kelley v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kelley
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00464
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Blackwell et al v. DolgenCorp LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01214
Defendant:
DolgenCorp LLC also known as Dollar General doing business as Dollar General Store Number 20340, Dollar General, Lisa Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Blackwell and David Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Kelley Cross
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
