Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Spencer v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv30084
Respondent:
Franklin County House of Correction, Kevin K. McAleenan, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Derrick R Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohammed v. Warden, Folkston ICE Processing Center
as 5:2020cv00071
Respondent:
Thomas Giles, Chad Wolf, Ronald D. Vitiello and others
Petitioner:
Farid Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohammed v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv02170
Respondent:
Thomas Giles, Chad Wolf, Ronald D. Vitiello and others
Petitioner:
Farid Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gutierrez v. Dubois
as 1:2020cv02079
Petitioner:
Ramon Gutierrez
Respondent:
Orange County Sherif Carl Dubois, Francis Russo, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
DUFFUS CHESTER et al v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv20351
Plaintiff:
MR MICHAEL DONNEL CHESTER and MRS HAZEL DUFFUS CHESTER
Defendant:
Acting Director Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Act. Sec. Dept. DHS Kevin K McAleenan, Regional Director, USCIS Southeast Region and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06419
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv20020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
