Cases 81 - 90 of 146
Converse Inc. v. Zulily, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05982
Plaintiff:
Converse Inc.
Defendant:
Edamame Kids, Inc., Gina Group, LLC, Mamiye Imports LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HUNTERS HELPING KIDS v. ALL 4 KIDS HUNTING, INC., et al
as 1:2014cv00571
Plaintiff:
HUNTERS HELPING KIDS, INC.
Defendant:
ALL 4 KIDS HUNTING, INC. and DALE DODSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BUZZ BEE TOYS, INC. v. TECH 4 KIDS, INC.
as 1:2014cv02391
Plaintiff:
BUZZ BEE TOYS, INC.
Defendant:
TECH 4 KIDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Kids 'R' Kids, Inc et al v. Kids Preschool, LLC
as 5:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kids 'R' Kids, Inc and Kids 'R' Kids International, Inc.
Defendant:
Kids Preschool, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kids 'R' Kids, Inc. et al v. Kids R Kids, Inc
as 2:2014cv02033
Plaintiff:
Kids 'R' Kids, Inc. and Kids 'R' Kids International, Inc.
Defendant:
Kids R Kids, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miller et al v. De Fina
as 4:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Miller and KIDS Inc
Defendant:
Phillip A De Fina
Counter_claimant:
Phillip A De Fina
Counter_defendant:
KIDS Inc and Daniel C. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cozy's Cuts for Kids, Inc. v. Inniss
as 1:2013cv01084
Plaintiff:
Cozy's Cuts for Kids, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacques Inniss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
DUNBAR v. MCFADDEN'S AT THE BALL PARK, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DUNBAR
Defendant:
MCFADDEN'S AT THE BALL PARK, LLC , MCFADDEN'S AT PHILLIES BALL PARK, LLC , MIRIAM'S KIDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
