Cases 1 - 10 of 25,161
FRASURE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv05636
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FRASURE and THE ESTATE OF FREDIA R. VICE, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LLT MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STREET v. GAC SHIPPING USA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01739
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY STREET
Defendant:
GAC SHIPPING USA, INC., INDEPENDENT CONTAINER LINE LTD., TRANSESTE SCHIFFAHRT, GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Acor-Long v. O'Mailey
as 3:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Acor-Long
Defendant:
Martin O'Mailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murdock et al v. HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC., et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Robert Murdock and Kimberly Murdock
Defendant:
HOLLAND AMERICA LINE INC.,, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE N.V., and HAL Antillen N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeBrahl-Daniels v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00519
Petitioner:
Leatrice Malika DeBrahl-Daniels
Defendant:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flesch v. Malcomb et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cody Joseph Vernon Flesch
Defendant:
Kimberly Malcomb, Travis Jones and Ray Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gray v. Prince
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Renee Gray
Defendant:
Samuel Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
May v. O'Malley
as 24-2568
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOANN MAY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
