Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Tyrone Scott v. Wayne Holdon, Jr., et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr., DEA, Officer, Miller County Detention Center, Rick Dodd, Retired DEA, Wayne Holding Co. and others
Scott v. Holdon et al
as 4:2023cv00810
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Scott
Defendant:
Wayne Holdon, Jr, Rick Dodd, Wayne Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Eric Price v. Kathryn Wilson
as 14-51215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC RAY PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHRYN WILSON
Ronald Stolle v. Kent State University, et al
as 14-3138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD STOLLE
Defendant:
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY, KATHRYN WILSON and LESTER LEFTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN THORNTON and RICHARD KOLBE
Tanguay et al v. American Medical Systems Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv32915
Plaintiff:
Anna Tanguay , Saundra Brown , Jennifer Heiser and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings Inc. , Endo Phamaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Wilson
as 6:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
Eric Ray Price
Defendant:
Kathryn Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
