Cases 1 - 10 of 1,043
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell, II
Defendant:
Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Winters v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Katie Hobbs and Bradley D Beauchamp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winters v. F-N-F Construction et al
as 2:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tanya Winters
Defendant:
F-N-F Construction, Zurich Insurance Company, Katie Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katie Sczesny, et al v. Philip Murphy, et al
as 24-1676
Plaintiff:
KATIE SCZESNY, JAIME RUMFIELD, DEBRA HAGEN and others
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, in his official and personal capacity and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
