Cases 11 - 20 of 40
US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Malec et al
as 3:2021cv01280
Defendant:
Stephen J. Malec, Keeley Malec, Stephen K. Malec, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank Trust Association and US Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US Bank Trust, N.A. v. Malec et al
as 3:2021cv00361
Defendant:
Stephen J. Malec, Keeley Malec, Stephen K. Malec Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
US Bank Trust National Association and US Bank Trust, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Keeley et al
as 3:2020cv00202
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney's Office Northern District of West Virginia, Irene Keeley, U.S. Marshals Service Northern District of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Keeley v. Town of South Kingstown et al
as 1:2019cv00511
Defendant:
Town of South Kingstown and David Marler
Plaintiff:
William Scott Keeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spencer v. Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv00278
Plaintiff:
Heather Spencer
Defendant:
Bob Adcox, Carl Funderburk, Jaime Vogt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Parga et al v. Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Parga , Richard Feltz , Tara O'Donley and others
Defendant:
Tulsa County, Vic Regalado , Terry H Bitting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Smith v. County of Santa Cruz, et al
as 16-17232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, EDITH DRISCOLL, MARY JO WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
