Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Cox v. Medical Device Business Services Inc
as 3:2017cv03398
Plaintiff:
Keith Cox
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
as LAM/3:17-cv-00723
Plaintiff:
Keith Cox
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
Cox v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Keith Cox
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darnell Baldwin v. David Abston, et al
as 14-60576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARNELL BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ABSTON, Pickens County Alabama Sheriff, KEITH COX, Pickens County Sheriff Det., JOHN MCBRIDE, Pickens County Sheriff Det. and others
Robert Davis v. Fort Valley Georgia, et al
as 14-12233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FORT VALLEY GEORGIA, City of, TERRY DEESE, Peach County, Fort Valley Georgia, SMITH, Peach County, Fort Valley Georgia and others
DAVIS vs FORT VALLEY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
FORT VALLEY GEORGIA, TERRY DEESE, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Abston et al
as 3:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Darnell Baldwin
Defendant:
David Abston, Keith Cox, John McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Moore et al
as 6:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Patrick A McCoy
Defendant:
James Moore, Chris McCool, Ira B Colvin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Bradt
as 12-3891
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Cox
Respondent - Appellee:
Mark Bradt, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
