Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Dixon v. Hooks
as 1:2014cv00891
Petitioner: Keith Dixon
Respondent: Brad Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIXON v. STERN & EISENBERG, PC et al
as 5:2014cv00891
Plaintiff: DENNIS KEITH DIXON
Defendant: STERN & EISENBERG, PC and EMPLOYEES, DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Montoya-Olachia v. Brayn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00263
Plaintiff: Ricardo Montoya-Olachia
Defendant: H Brayn, L Bond, Dalby Health Service Staff Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27523
Plaintiff: Peggy Sue Dixon and William Keith Dixon
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 5:2013cv03199
Plaintiff: DENNIS KEITH DIXON
Defendant: OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and DOES 1 THRU 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Montero v. Dixon
as 5:2012cv00052
Petitioner: Israel Dominguez Montero
Respondent: Keith Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2011cv00456
Plaintiff: Keith Dixon and Shantuicha S. Dixon
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Memphis Hand Center, Inc. v. Dixon et al
as 2:2008cv02871
Plaintiff: Memphis Hand Center, Inc.
Defendant: Tammie Lynn Wilson Rowland Dixon and Keith Dixon
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Brandriff et al v. Dataw Island Owners' Association Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2007cv03361
Plaintiff: Robert C Brandriff, Robert C Brandriff, Kristen E Brandriff and others
Defendant: Dataw Island Owners' Association Inc, Dataw Island Club Inc, Bruce Skip Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?