Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-10621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROBERTS v. PHAMS et al
as 5:2025cv00476
Defendant:
WARDEN ANGELA PHAMS, DEPUTY WARDEN VANESSA BUTTS-HAWKINS, CONSTANCE NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lugo v. Fisher
as 25-6731
Petitioner:
KEITH ROBERT LUGO
Respondent:
R FISHER, Warden at Valley State Prison
Caldwell Sr. v. Segarnick et al
as 3:2025cv01155
Plaintiff:
Keith Robert Caldwell Sr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Segarnick, U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. PHAMS et al
as 5:2025cv00419
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ROBERTS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANGELA PHAMS, LIBRARY CLERK CONSTANCE M NELSON, SGT BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Smith v. Secretary of the Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-2854
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CHESTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-13022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11602
Defendant:
3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Dupont De Nemours, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Abby Kristen Adams, Lakisha Shawn Adorno, Miriam Anderez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
(HC) Lugo v. Fisher
as 1:2025cv00917
Petitioner:
Keith Robert Lugo
Respondent:
R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Robert Lugo v. R. Fisher
as 5:2025cv01843
Petitioner:
Keith Robert Lugo
Respondent:
R Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
