Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,963
Thompson v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv03670
Plaintiff: Arron Marko Thompson
Defendant: Kelly Wasko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant: Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner: Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent: Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff: JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Kelly v. Dixon (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00830
Petitioner: Ricky Raynard Kelly
Respondent: Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ussery v. Law Office of Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Roger Ussery
Defendant: Law Office of Public Defender and Kelly Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff: KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff: Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant: Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: Mark Barker
Defendant: Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff: Bobby Tatum
Defendant: C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?