Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Head v. Morris
as 4:2026cv01155
Petitioner:
Andrew Allen Wayne Head
Respondent:
Warden Kelly Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Foley et al
as 2:2026cv04056
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Berry
Defendant:
Trevor Foley, Dr. Phillip Tippen, Doris Falkenrath and others
Interested Party:
Curators of the University of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Mansfield v. Kelly Morris
as 24-3235
Respondent:
Kelly Morris, Acting Warden
Petitioner:
James Eric Mansfield
Dale v. Morris et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Williams, COI Unknown Hamilton, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Darna Dale, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feindt v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Patrick Feindt, Jr., Natasha Freeman, Jamie Simic and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Morris v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kelly Morris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, FRIAD and others
William Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, et al
as 21-16670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM J. WHITSITT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, KELLY MORRIS and others
Thomas-El v. Perry et al
as 4:2021cv00557
Defendant:
J Stovall, Austin, B Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon H Thomas-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
