Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Aaron Raiser v. United States District Court for the Southern Dist, et al
as 23-55635
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON RAISER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ALL NON-JUDICIAL STAFF OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SUPERVISING JUDGE, Pro Se Staff and others
Andrews v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dessie Andrews
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Current and Former Members of Congress, Robert B Aderholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LASSITER v. ADERHOLT et al
as 1:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
ROBERT B. ADERHOLT, RICK ALLEN, JODEY ARRINGTON and others
Debtor:
RANDY WEBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
E K Wade
Defendant:
Jeff Miller, Gary Ackerman, Sandy Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCluskey et al v. Belford High School et al
as 2:2009cv14345
Plaintiff:
Carrie McCluskey, Carrie McCluskey, Evelyn Reisdorff and others
Defendant:
Belford High School, Belford University, Education Services Provider, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
