Cases 61 - 70 of 124
PBS Coals Inc, et al v. Director OWCP United States De, et al
as 14-4089
Petitioner:
PBS COALS INC and ROCKWOOD CASUALTY INSURANCE CO
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OWCP UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KENNETH A. DAVIS
Davis v. National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv03697
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Davis
Defendant:
National Football League, NFL Films, Inc. and NFL Productions, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02865
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Beers Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Director, TDCJCID
as 1:2014cv00609
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wade Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJCID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kenneth Davis v. Timothy Keith
as 14-30505
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH D. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY KEITH, Warden, Winn Correctional Center
Davis v. Winn Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Davis
Defendant:
Warden Winn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Hood v. Montgomery County Texas, et al
as 14-20040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY DALE HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS, KENNETH G. DAVIS, EDSEL WEST and others
Davis v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01340
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Davis
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Dr. D. Pagarigan, Lt. Merola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Cargotec USA, Inc., et al
as 7:2013cv00221
Defendant:
Cargotec USA, Inc. and Kenneth Gerald Davis
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline McQueen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
