Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3313
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
MORRIS v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00084
Defendant: ASSOCIATE WARDEN CHURCH, PSYCHOLOGIST CRANMER, ASSOCIATE WARDEN DENHAM and others
Plaintiff: KENNETH A. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Morris v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00013
Plaintiff: Kenneth J Morris
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02559
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris v. Premiere Credit North America, LLC
as 4:2007cv03705
Plaintiff: Kenneth M Morris
Defendant: Premiere Credit North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morris v. Asset Acceptance LLC
as 4:2007cv03346
Plaintiff: Kenneth M Morris
Defendant: Asset Acceptance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morris v. Equifax Information We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-20654
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH M MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee: EQUIFAX
Morris v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-70012
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH WAYNE MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Scheck Investments, et al v. Viatical Benefactors, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv21160
Plaintiff: Scheck Investments, L.P. , Paul Pappas and Elena Parrales
Defendant: Viatical Benefactors, LLC, Viatical Services, Inc., Kensington Management, Inc. and others
Receiver: Roberto Martinez
Movant: Hugo Group , Calabria Assets Ltd and Post-Closing MBC Investors
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?