Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Copeland v. Cook County Department of Corrections Jail et al
as 1:2013cv05842
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections Jail and Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayden v. New Zion Baptist Church et al
as 3:2013cv50048
Plaintiff:
Rashoud Gayden
Defendant:
New Zion Baptist Church and Kenneth Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of and John Does/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. Drew
as 1:2012cv04323
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland
Defendant:
Drew, USP Atlanta Prison Medical Services, Darren Martin and others
Allen v. Copeland et al
as 6:2012cv03105
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Allen
Defendant:
Kenneth - Copeland , Newton County Prosec Skouby and Timothy W Perigo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills et al v. RM International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland, David Gibbs, Rodney Johnson and others
Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America LLC, James Keyes, RM International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Copeland v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers, Police Officer Francis, Police Officer Gerardo Meola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00009
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Melton et al
as 2:2009cv00039
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Douglas Clark, II
Defendant:
W. B. Melton, Mike Kruger, Brandon Grogan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
