Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gaines et al v. Fitness International, LLC
as 1:2014cv03647
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gaines , Francis Hamilton , Darron Spann and others
Defendant:
Fitness International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams et al v Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07070
Plaintiff:
Albert Williams, Albert Williams, Albert Williams and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina Supreme Court
as 09-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH, for herself and those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, solely in its legislative capacity; and solely for injunctive relief, CHARLES AUSTIN, in his official capacity as City Manager for the City of Columbia ["the City" or "Columbia"], ROBERT C. COBLE, in his official capacity as Mayor for the City of Columbia, SC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1664
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina Supreme Court, The et al
as 3:2009cv00507
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
South Carolina Supreme Court, The, Charles Austin, Robert C Coble and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Duran v. Gaines et al
as 1:2007cv12046
Plaintiff:
Irvin Duran
Defendant:
Kenneth Gaines, Paul Russell and Douglas Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
