Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20104
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17592
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dent v. Leadbetter et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert Dent
Defendant:
John Leadbetter, Randy Walker, C. Speth and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MACK v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01678
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M COMPANY and KENNETH MACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOSHELL et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02962
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPANN, RODRICK BUTLER, STEPHEN SWIX and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Boshell et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01983
Plaintiff:
James Spann, Rodrick Butler, Stephen Swix and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tucker v. BBVA Compass Bank et al
as 3:2018cv02725
Defendant:
New Home Solution and Investment, Cederic Lydelle Brown, American Dream and Educational Concepts and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Tucker and Eddie Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Murdock et al v. Gaddy et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Cleo Murdock and Russell Elswick
Defendant:
John Rutherford, Kanawha County Sheriff Office, Christopher David Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Mack v. Charles Rosenthal, et al
as 10-20055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES ROSENTHAL, FEAZEL, HAROLD HURTT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
