Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McShan v. Jefferson County et al
as 2:2020cv05898
Plaintiff:
Joseph McShan
Defendant:
Kenneth Richardson, Maurice Tucker, Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Matevousian
as 1:2017cv01564
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richardson
Respondent:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02894
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02888
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RICHARDSON v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY et al
as 1:2016cv01939
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL PROVIDER, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Ewing v. Dewayne Kempker, et al
as 14-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jermaine S. Ewing
Defendant - Appellee:
Dewayne Kempker, Deputy Division Director Adult Institutions, Ian Wallace, Warden, Southeast Correctional Center, William Stange, Assistant Warden, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Richardson v. USA
as 3:2014cv00028
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richardson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ewing v. Kempker et al
as 1:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jermaine S. Ewing
Defendant:
Dewayne Kempker, Ian Wallace, William Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Mississippi County 33rd Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bell
Defendant:
Mississippi County 33rd Judicial Circuit, William H. Winchester, III, Darren Cann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON v. FOLINO et al
as 1:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
JOHN KENNETH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BRIAN COLEMAN, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
