Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13538
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Giles v. TVI, Inc.
as 4:2026cv01890
Plaintiff:
Kevin Giles
Defendant:
TVI, Inc. doing business as Savers Value Village, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kiser v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00188
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moss v. Bisignano
as 5:2026cv06492
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
THOMPSON v. MCCLANAHAN et al
as 1:2026cv01292
Defendant:
JOHN P. BURNS, DIANNE RENWICK, DAKOTA RAMSEUR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 4:2026cv01892
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Caitlin J. Halligan and Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00947
Defendant:
Kevin Mcclanahan et al
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
O'Brien v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2026cv03015
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kevin O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 1:2026cv01478
Defendant:
John P Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
