Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Robinson et al
as 5:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cook
Defendant:
Robert M. Robinson , Robinson Automotive Group, Inc. and Bob Robinson Chevrolet-Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dearing v. Monroe County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Dearing
Respondent:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, Dusty Rollison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robin Cook v. Jones & Jordan Engineering, In
as 09-2283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN D. COOK and KEVIN COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
JONES & JORDAN ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, JAMES A. JONES, Individually and KEVIN W. JORDAN, Individually
Defendant - None:
THOMAS W. HANNIGAN, Individually
Third Party Defendant - None:
MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, INCORPORATED
Robin Cook v. Jones & Jordan Engineering, In
as 09-2246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBIN D. COOK and KEVIN COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
JONES & JORDAN ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, JAMES A. JONES, Individually and KEVIN W. JORDAN, Individually
Defendant - None:
THOMAS W. HANNIGAN, Individually
Third Party Defendant - None:
MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD, INCORPORATED
Giles v. Anastasia et al
as 1:2008cv02219
Plaintiff:
Katherine Giles
Defendant:
Mark Anastasia and Kevin Cook
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America v. Cook
as 2:2007x50757
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kevin Cook
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McMurrain, et al v. Creslenn Oil Company, et al
as 1:2002cv01048
Defendant:
Urbana Well Servicing Company, Inc., EMCO Oil Company, Pan-Am Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Johnson, R J McHenry, C B Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
