Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Goodman v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00858
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kevin Goodman
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodman v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Kevin Goodman, Jr.
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodman v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2021cv05455
Plaintiff:
Kevin Goodman
Defendant:
The County of Nassau and Detective Sherman Payami
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GOODMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61095
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raq Bey v. Jared Malec, et al
as 20-16177
Defendant:
CITY OF EMERYVILLE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAQ BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DINO CRISTIANI, RONALD SHEPERD, ANDREW YU and others
Raq Bey v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70758
Not Classified By Court:
In re: RAQ BEY
Not Yet Classified:
ANDREW YU, RONALD SHEPERD, KEVIN GOODMAN, Officer and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Petitioner:
RAQ BEY
GOODMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2018cv02765
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
