Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Walles et al v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12889
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walles and Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Walls, Sr. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv10083
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walls v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walls
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Corrections, Kevin Bowser, Jonathan Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Hynes-Simms et al
as 3:2021cv00467
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Mr. Mason, Stacy Oakes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97095
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WALLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
N. v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2018cv10153
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY, GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN WALL and others
Plaintiff:
A. N.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A. N. v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2018cv10154
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY , GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , KEVIN WALL and others
Plaintiff:
A. N.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Wall v. Gold's Gym International, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01261
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wall
Defendant:
Gold's Gym International, Inc., 30 on W. 54th Corp. and Gary Prince
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
