Cases 1 - 10 of 70
(HC) Phan v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Minh Kha Hoang Phan
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loadsmith, Inc. v. Ali
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Loadsmith, Inc.
Defendant:
Khadir Ali d/b/a KHA Transportation and Khadir Ismail Ali doing business as KHA Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Nguyen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05002
Plaintiff:
Kha Nguyen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12026
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Pham v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Xuan-Kha Pham
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
SOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03835
Plaintiff:
KHA SOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dang v. Chapa
as 5:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Kha Minh Dang
Respondent:
Warden Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davenport v. Pettigrew et al
as 1:2022cv00598
Plaintiff:
Empress Davenport
Defendant:
Demetrius Pettigrew and KHA Logistics,LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pham v. Lewis, Jr et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kha Van Pham
Defendant:
Danny L Lewis, Jr and Jim Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
