Cases 11 - 20 of 450
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sardar Ashrafkhan v. USA
as 24-1019
Petitioner:
SARDAR ASHRAFKHAN, aka Sardar Khan, (Dr. Khan)
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonham v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Bonham
Defendant:
Ronald Barnett, Mike Gleason and Ghulam Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khan v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Donald Khan
Respondent:
Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owl Feather- Gorbey v. John or Jane Doe et al
as 0:2023cv03229
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Michael S. Owl Feather- Gorbey, Prince Michael S. Owl Feather- Chow-Chow (Son of Heaven) and Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Henry McMaster, Uncle Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
KHAN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03068
Petitioner:
ERIK BILAL KHAN
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) George v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Louis George, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Lopez, C. Lor, Eniola Oguntuase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
