Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Campbell et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12270
Plaintiff:
Brian Campbell and Kim Campbell
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Wonnell v. Lau et al
as 1:2021cv00817
Defendant:
John M. Vierling, Robert J. Spiegel, Stephanie Davis and others
Nominal Defendant:
Athenex, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Wonnell
Paragon Systems, Inc. v. Hughes et al
as 1:2020cv01209
Plaintiff:
Paragon Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Hughes and Kim Campbell
Pendell v. United States Secret Service et al
as 1:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Perry Pendell
Defendant:
Kim Campbell and United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Towns, Joshua v. Dittman, Micheal et al
as 3:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
Joshua Towns
Defendant:
Micheal Dittman , Karen Anderson, Keisha Perrenoud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towns v. Dittman et al
as 2:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Joshua G Towns
Defendant:
Michael Dittman , Keisha Perrenoud, Meredith Mashak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clauff v. Markvicka et al
as 4:2017cv03071
Defendant:
Kim Campbell, Jim Helgoth, Christina Markvicka and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Clauff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Campbell v. Cropper et al
as 1:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kim Campbell
Defendant:
Roberta Cropper and Edwin S. Cropper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter, Jackie v. Green, James et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jackie Carter
Defendant:
James Green , Edward Wall, Micheal Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
