Cases 91 - 100 of 162
GEORGE et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv08739
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GEORGE and KIM SMITH
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
HARRISON v. SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
JAMES CURTIS HARRISON
Defendant:
SCI FOREST MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and KIM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindner, et al v. Roti Restaurants, LLC
as 1:2016cv07653
Plaintiff:
Lindner, Cooper Lindner and Kim Smith
Defendant:
Roti Restaurants, LLC and Roti Restaurants, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Roti Modern Mediterranean doing business as Roti Mediterranean Grill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WYATT v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
ROY WYATT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY SMEAL, OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. NOEL et al
as 1:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
PAUL NOEL, CARL KELDTE, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Timothy Farley
Defendant:
Kim Smith and Shepherd Management, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEAY v. SAGER et al
as 1:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant:
SAGER, BERRY, SMAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STAFFORD v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
DAMON DEMOND STAFFORD
Defendant:
KAREN HENDERSON, PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, KIM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
