Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Defendant:
William Burns, Stephan Breyer, Andrew Weissmann and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Shelton Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ewin v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Tywaska Ewin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clement et al v. CSC of Cobb County Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo E. Clement and Ken Morton
Defendant:
CSC of Cobb County Inc., Hood Clayton Logistics LLC and The Kroger Co.
SUMNER v. THE KROGER CO.
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
RASHEEDA SUMNER
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blassingame v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2022cv03261
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Blassingame
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Stanley Elligan, Lt. Richard Phillips and others
Blassingame v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2022cv03251
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Blassingame
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Stanley Elligan, Lt. Richard Phillips and others
Mitchell v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. d/b/a Kroger Store No. 138 and The Kroger Co. doing business as Kroger Store No. 138
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Demary v. Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2020cv00729
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I doing business as Kroger and Kroger Co. doing business as Kroger
Plaintiff:
Sabur Demary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Summerfield v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 2:2020cv02389
Defendant:
Ken Nsia and The Kroger Co.
Plaintiff:
Joshua J. Summerfield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
