Cases 11 - 20 of 624
Jones v. Krueger et al
as 2:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D Jones
Defendant:
Heather Krueger, Alexander Hollfelder and Dr Jasmine Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Krueger
as 6:2023cv03241
Petitioner:
Vertis R McCoy
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Lee et al
as 2:2023cv11684
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Brandon Lee, Lance Thompson, Krueger and others
Czerpak v. Krueger et al
as 2:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Czerpak
Defendant:
Deputy Peter Krueger, Deputy Wayne Blanchard and Walworth County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solberg v. Krueger
as 1:2023cv00795
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
J E Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Knox v. Krueger
as 0:2023cv02811
Petitioner:
Tito L Knox
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knox v. Krueger
as 6:2023cv03163
Petitioner:
Tito L Knox
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Sangamon County et al
as 3:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dylan Schlieper-Clark and Starla Smith
Defendant:
Sangamon County, Sheriff Jack Campbell, Corrections Officer Christina Wheeler and others
Administrator:
Estate Administrator Starla Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENZIE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. MENZIE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CITY OF NEW CASTLE, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krueger v. Arledge et al
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Defendant:
Roy Wade Arledge, Texas Board of Pardons & Parole, Central Division, Austin, TX and TDCJ-ID Institutional Division, Huntsville, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
